Feinberg s theory of punishment

For example, if you strike me, your blow will hurt me; the pain I feel may be considered bad in itself, but the moral status of your blow will also depend on whether you were morally allowed such a gesture perhaps through parental status, although that is controversial or even obliged to execute it e.

But, so the argument goes, it cannot be morally permissible, let alone morally mandatory, to perform an act that leads directly to the punishment of an innocent person. George, The Autonomy of Law: What makes a desire self-regarding is controversial, but there are clear cases and counter-cases: References and Further Reading 1.

Philosophy of Law

Essays in the Philosophy of Law. If so, I do have Feinberg s theory of punishment to care specially about all of the future selves I am continuous with, and do not have this reason to care specially about others with whom I am not continuous.

The same seems to go for rational egoism: Among the notable broadly egalitarian philosophies are communism, socialism, left-libertarianismand progressivism, which propound economic, political, and legal egalitarianism, respectively. However, i if believing that one ought to act as a kin altruist rather than as a rational egoist is what best increases reproductive fitness, rational egoism is, like utilitarianism, not undercut by 1 and 2.

Objection and Response This overriding process, however, cannot work in the opposite direction. On Finnis's view of the Overlap Thesis, the essential function of law is to provide a justification for state coercion.

Virginia death penalty unconstitutional for people with an intellectual disability and Roper v. A problem consistently raised with capability approaches is the ability to weigh capabilities in order to arrive at a metric for equality. While this task is usually interpreted as an attempt to analyze the concepts of law and legal system, there is some confusion as to both the value and character of conceptual analysis in philosophy of law.

I might be required by my non-egoist morality to make a sacrifice for which I cannot be compensated or pass up a gain so large that passing it up will not be compensated for.

In the past, cowardiceabsence without leave, desertioninsubordinationlootingshirking under enemy fire and disobeying orders were often crimes punishable by death see decimation and running the gauntlet.

The point is that this is what we are trying to express in punishing someone: On Hart's view, then, every society with a full-blown legal system necessarily has a rule of recognition that articulates criteria for legal validity that include provisions for making, changing and adjudicating law.

Bix takes conceptual analysis in law to be primarily concerned with 3 and 4. Say I derive welfare from playing hockey. Borrowing heavily from Jeremy BenthamJohn Austin argues that the principal distinguishing feature of a legal system is the presence of a sovereign who is habitually obeyed by most people in the society, but not in the habit of obeying any determinate human superior.

Actually, Walzer's theory of complex equality is not aimed at equality but at the separation of spheres of justice, the theory's designation thus being misleading. The problem is intensified by the fact that various moral perspectives are comprised in the concept of capability Cohenp. At the heart of the CLS critique of liberal jurisprudence is the idea that radical indeterminacy is inconsistent with liberal conceptions of legitimacy.

Feinberg’s expressive theory

Against the unpleasant experience hypothesis, Batson found that giving high-empathy subjects easy ways of stopping the experience other than by helping did not reduce helping.

In most countries that practise capital punishment, it is now reserved for murderterrorismwar crimesespionagetreasonor as part of military justice. It is not clear that F1 has reason to care specially about F3 — F3 might seem a stranger, perhaps even an unlikeable one. A prescriptive use of equality is present when a prescriptive standard is applied, i.

Capital punishment

This argument has drawbacks. Rational Egoism Rational egoism claims that it is necessary and sufficient for an action to be rational that it maximize one's self-interest. And they believe that reward and punishment, benefits and burdens, should be proportional to such deserts.

Murderers deserve to be put to death. Suppose a utilitarian were visiting an area in which there was racial strife, and that, during his visit, a Negro rapes a white woman, and that race riots occur as a result of the crime, white mobs, with the connivance of the police, bashing and killing Negroes, etc.

He would deny as ridiculous the claim that he acted in his self-interest. If these authorities were utilitarians, they would be committed to giving him a very severe sentence, 10 years perhaps, if this were the only way to deter a significant number of petty thieves. Ethical egoism, then, recommends an impossible state of affairs.

Punishment. Punishment involves the deliberate infliction of suffering on a supposed or actual offender for an offense such as a moral or legal transgression. The Hollywood Reporter is your source for breaking news about Hollywood and entertainment, including movies, TV, reviews and industry blogs.

Justice is the legal or philosophical theory by which fairness is administered.

Philosophy of Law

As with most philosophically-driven disciplines, the concept of justice differs in every hazemagmaroc.com early theory of justice was set out by the Ancient Greek philosopher Plato in his work The hazemagmaroc.comtes of divine command theory say that justice issues from God.

Subsequent to Feinberg’s article, some philosophers have explored the possibility that the justifications of these two aspects of punishment are related. One group of subsequent theories, which I will call communicative theories. Joel Feinberg believes the harm principle does not provide sufficient protection against the wrongful behaviors of others, as it is inconsistent with many criminal prohibitions we take for granted as being justified.

The problem with the deterrence theory is that it justifies punishment of one person on the strength of the effects that it. 40 (Volume 20, No. 1) March, Introduction by The Editors. SOCIALISM AND DEMOCRACY AT Frank Rosengarten – Looking Back in Order to Look Ahead: Twenty Years of Research and Publishing by the Research Group on Socialism and Democracy Victor Wallis – Socialism and Democracy During the First 20 Years of Socialism and Democracy.


Feinberg s theory of punishment
Rated 3/5 based on 2 review
Archive – Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review